Safety · Pharmacovigilance

Pharmacovigilance

Pharmacovigilance is the work of finding out what a medicine actually does once it is in use, and acting on it. This page explains how to tell us about a suspected adverse reaction to an Ergopharm product, what we do with what you tell us, and how reporting to us differs from reporting to the public scheme in your country. If you are unwell now, treat this page as second priority — medical care comes first.

If you or someone else is unwell right now, seek medical care first. Contact your doctor, pharmacist or local emergency service. This page is not a clinical service, it is not monitored around the clock, and nothing on it should delay treatment. Report to us afterwards — a report submitted a week later is still worth making. If a pack looks tampered with, damaged or wrong, stop using it, keep it, and report it here as well as through the verification page.

What a report is

A report — formally an Individual Case Safety Report, or ICSR — is one person's account of one patient who had something unwanted happen while taking or after taking a medicine. It is not an accusation and it is not a legal claim. It does not have to prove that the medicine caused the reaction: causality is assessed afterwards, by us and by the authorities, across many cases. The word that matters is suspected. If you suspect a connection, that is the threshold for reporting, and it is deliberately set low.

The four validity criteria, in plain terms

An identifiable reporter
Someone we can go back to with questions. A name or initials plus one contact route is enough. Patients, parents, carers, doctors, nurses, pharmacists, distributors and our own staff all count as reporters.
An identifiable patient
One single, distinguishable person. They are identifiable if you can give any one of: initials, a patient reference, date of birth, an age or age band, or sex. A full legal name is never required. "A friend of mine" without any of those cannot be counted, because we cannot tell two such reports apart.
A suspect medicinal product
At least one Ergopharm product named as suspected — the product name or the active substance. Strength, LOT and EXP from the carton make the case far more useful, but their absence does not invalidate it.
A suspect reaction
At least one unwanted effect, described in your own words. "Painful lump at the injection site that lasted five days" is a valid reaction description. Medical vocabulary is not expected of you; converting your words into standard terminology is our job.

An incomplete report is still worth sending. If one of the four criteria is missing, the report is not thrown away — it is logged, given a case number, and we attempt follow-up to complete it. Many real safety signals were first visible as a scatter of thin, partial reports that nobody thought were worth submitting. Send what you have. Do not wait until you can answer every field on the form.

What happens to your report

  1. 01

    1 — Intake

    Every report is logged in our safety database on the day it reaches us and given a unique case number. You receive an acknowledgement with that number, normally within two business days. Reports arriving by email, by post, through a distributor or through our contact form all enter the same queue.

  2. 02

    2 — Validity check

    A trained case processor tests the report against the four criteria above. Valid cases proceed to full processing. Cases missing an element are held open as incomplete and enter follow-up rather than being closed. Nothing is deleted.

  3. 03

    3 — Coding

    Your words — the verbatim term — are preserved unchanged, and a standardised term is attached alongside them using MedDRA, the ICH medical terminology, currently version 29.0 (March 2026). Coding runs up the hierarchy from Lowest Level Term to Preferred Term to System Organ Class, so that a "lump at the injection site" and an "injection-site nodule" reported in two countries become countable as the same thing. The case is structured to the ICH E2B(R3) data model.

  4. 04

    4 — Seriousness and expectedness

    Seriousness is a regulatory classification, not a measure of how bad you felt. A case is serious if it resulted in death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalisation, caused persistent or significant disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly, or is another medically important condition — the ICH E2A criteria. Separately, the reaction is checked against the reference safety information for the product (the undesirable-effects section of the SmPC and leaflet) to determine whether it is expected or unexpected. Serious and unexpected is the combination that moves fastest.

  5. 05

    5 — Follow-up

    For anything serious, unexpected, or unclear, we come back to you with targeted questions: dates of first and last dose, dose and route, what happened when the medicine was stopped and — only if it happened, never as a suggestion — restarted, other medicines taken, relevant history, and how the reaction ended. We make up to three follow-up attempts and then close follow-up, keeping the case on file as it stands. You are free to decline; the original report still counts.

  6. 06

    6 — Onward transmission

    Where our product is placed on a market by a local marketing-authorisation holder, the validated case is transmitted to that holder under the safety data exchange agreement, inside the clock agreed there so that they can meet their own submission deadlines to the competent authority.

  7. 07

    7 — Aggregate and signal review

    Individual cases are the raw material; the analysis happens across them. Cases are reviewed in a standing periodic aggregate review together with complaints, batch records and literature, using the signal-management approach of EU GVP Module IX and the planning principles of ICH E2E. A confirmed signal can end in a leaflet or SmPC change, a manufacturing or packaging investigation, a change to a specification, or a documented decision that no change is warranted. "No change, and here is why" is a legitimate and recorded outcome.

2 business days
Target acknowledgement of any report, with case number
15 / 90 days
Serious / non-serious submission clocks our safety data exchange agreements are built around (EU GVP Module VI)
MedDRA 29.0
Terminology version currently used for reaction coding
10 years
Minimum retention of safety data after an authorisation expires, per the EU pharmacovigilance implementing rules

Reporting to us, reporting to a national scheme

These are two separate channels and they are not connected in the way most people assume. Telling us does not automatically place your report in your national database, and telling your national authority does not automatically bring it to us. Each route does something the other cannot. A report to Ergopharm reaches the people who hold the batch record, the packaging line data and the serialisation history for your exact carton, so it can be tied to a LOT and, if needed, trigger a manufacturing investigation. A report to your national scheme enters an independent public database that pools data across every manufacturer and every product, which is where population-level patterns become visible. You may use either. You may use both, and for anything serious we would rather you did — duplicate cases are routinely identified and merged by the authorities, so there is no harm in reporting twice.

Public reporting schemes

  • United Kingdom — the MHRA Yellow Card scheme, at yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk, through the Yellow Card app, or by freephone on 0800 731 6789. Open to patients and to healthcare professionals alike.
  • United States — FDA MedWatch. Consumers and patients use Form FDA 3500B; healthcare professionals use Form FDA 3500. Both can be submitted online.
  • European Union and EEA — the national reporting system for your own country, listed in EMA QRD Appendix V. The relevant national details are reproduced in the possible-side-effects section of the printed package leaflet of each authorised product.
  • India — the Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI), coordinated by the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission in Ghaziabad, with a toll-free helpline on 1800-180-3024 and the ADR PvPI mobile app.
  • Elsewhere — your national pharmacovigilance centre. Most national centres contribute de-identified data to the WHO global database maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre, so a report made locally still counts internationally.

Situations worth reporting even when nothing obviously went wrong

  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding exposure — any exposure during pregnancy, around conception, or while breastfeeding, whether or not anything unwanted has happened. These cases are followed up to outcome, because that is the only way exposure data is ever accumulated. Several of our products are contraindicated in pregnancy; report the exposure regardless.
  • Off-label use — the medicine used for an indication, population, dose or duration outside the authorised labelling. Report the use and any reaction. We record it; we do not advise on it and we cannot endorse it.
  • Misuse, abuse and overdose — intentional excessive use, use for non-medical effect, or a dose above what was prescribed. Reports of this kind are handled clinically and confidentially; they are not passed to employers, sporting bodies or law enforcement as a matter of routine practice.
  • Medication error — a wrong product, wrong strength, wrong route, wrong patient or wrong frequency, including errors caught before they reached the patient. Near-misses are especially informative, because they often point at something about the carton, the label or the leaflet that we can change.
  • Lack of effect — the medicine did nothing, or stopped working. Reported alongside the LOT, this is one of the few external signals that can point at a genuine product-quality problem, so it is handled as a quality complaint as well as a safety report.
  • Occupational exposure — exposure at work rather than by prescription: a needlestick, a spill, powder handling, or contact during transport and warehousing. Report it through this page even if you have never been our patient or customer.

Who is responsible where

Ergopharm, as manufacturer
We manufacture the product under GMP conditions in Vadodara, Gujarat, and we serialise every saleable carton. Our safety function receives reports from anywhere in the world, processes them, investigates anything that touches a batch, and holds the manufacturing and packaging record behind your specific LOT.
The local marketing-authorisation holder
In each market where our product is placed on the market by a local holder, that holder — not Ergopharm — carries the statutory pharmacovigilance obligations in that territory: submission of cases to the competent authority within the local timeframes, periodic safety reporting, literature monitoring and labelling maintenance. Sending your report to us does not replace that route; we pass the case on to them.
The safety data exchange agreement
A written safety data exchange agreement between us and each local holder fixes the mechanics before anything goes wrong: who receives what, in which format, within how many calendar days, in which language, who owns follow-up, who answers a regulator's question, and how reconciliation is performed so that a case cannot be lost in the gap between two companies.
You, the reporter
Nothing. There is no obligation on a patient or member of the public to report, no consequence for reporting, and no cost. Healthcare professionals may have obligations under their own national rules — those apply independently of anything on this page.

How to reach the safety function

Use the form below; it collects the fields we would otherwise have to obtain from you by follow-up. If you prefer, write to pharmacovigilance@ergopharm.net with as much of the same information as you have, or contact the distributor who supplied the product and ask them to forward it — they are contractually required to pass safety information to us. Quote the case number in any later correspondence. If your report concerns a pack you believe to be falsified rather than a reaction to it, use the pack verification page as well; suspected-falsification cases follow a different internal path.

A safety report cannot be made fully anonymous, and it is worth understanding why before you submit one. The four validity criteria require an identifiable reporter and an identifiable patient — strip those out and the report cannot be counted, cannot be distinguished from a duplicate, and cannot be followed up. What we do instead is minimise and pseudonymise: only what the safety assessment needs is collected, direct identifiers are replaced by a case number in onward transmission, and access is restricted to the safety function. Health data in these reports is processed for reasons of public interest in the area of public health — the basis recognised in Article 9(2)(i) GDPR and its equivalents elsewhere. Safety data is retained for as long as the product is on the market and for at least ten years after an authorisation expires, and is not deleted on request during that period, because a pharmacovigilance record that can be erased is a pharmacovigilance record that cannot be trusted. Safety reports are never used for marketing and are never sold.

Report a suspected adverse reaction

Reports from patients and from healthcare professionals carry equal weight.

Initials are sufficient. An identifiable reporter is one of the four criteria that make a report valid.

Used to send your case number and to ask follow-up questions. You may decline follow-up at any point.

Determines which national scheme also applies and which local marketing-authorisation holder the case is routed to.

Only if you are reporting as a healthcare professional — for example physician, pharmacist, nurse.

Leave blank if you are the patient. Initials, or any patient reference you use — never a full name.

An age band alone satisfies the identifiable-patient criterion. Exact age or date of birth is not required.

If more than one Ergopharm product is suspected, name the others in the reaction description.

As printed on the carton, for example 250 mg/ml or 10 mg.

The batch number on the carton, ampoule or blister. This is what ties the case to a manufacturing record.

Expiry as printed, MM / YYYY.

The code under the scratch panel, in the form TE250-9A0451. Optional, but it identifies the individual carton.

Amount and how often — for example 1 ml once weekly, or one tablet daily.

Approximate is fine. If you do not know, leave it blank rather than guessing precisely.

Leave blank if it is still being taken.

Describe the suspected reaction in your own words: when it started relative to the dose, how long it lasted, and whether it changed when the medicine was stopped. Your wording is kept verbatim in the case file alongside the coded term.

A regulatory classification (ICH E2A), not a judgement of how severe it felt. If unsure, choose the closest and we will reassess.

The standard ICH E2B(R3) outcome categories.

All other medicines, including non-prescription products and supplements, with dose and dates where known — whether or not you suspect them.

Existing conditions, allergies, previous reactions to the same or a related medicine, pregnancy, and alcohol or tobacco use where relevant.

A photograph of the carton, ampoule or blister showing LOT and EXP, of the affected area, or a discharge summary. JPG, PNG or PDF, up to 10 MB. Please obscure names and identifiers on any clinical document before uploading.

Processing means recording the case, contacting you for follow-up, and transmitting a pseudonymised version to the local marketing-authorisation holder and, through them, to the competent authority. Without consent the report cannot be processed.

Fields marked * are required. Personal data in a report is processed under our privacy policy.